A pastor named Ryan Burge has been making a name for himself – although not for pastoral work. Ryan left his full-time ministry in the American Baptist Church some years ago and now works in academia as a demographer. He studies and writes about the numbers.
And the numbers tell Ryan that the middle is falling out of the church.
His research finds that the church is becoming increasingly polarized – which is not surprising, because our society is growing increasingly polarized. But one thing I found interesting: Ryan attributes this change in the church to the decline in the mainline denominations, including the PC(USA).
Membership in our denomination – along with others like the United Methodist, the Episcopalian, the United Church of Christ, the Evangelical Lutherans, and the American Baptists – has been declining for many years now. These churches were at one time the backbone of Christianity in America. They tended to be moderate because they were made up of people from all across the spectrum, who were happy to be together with one another and lean to the middle.
And I suppose the reason this was possible was that church members did not particularly align their faith with their political positions. That seems to have changed.
I don’t know, maybe we should have seen this coming? We all know that we are living in a hyper-partisan age, that our society has been sorting ourselves out by partisan politics for some years. Sociologists have called this the Big Sort. Ryan Burge calls what is happening in the church the Big Church Sort. It is a case of people choosing their church affiliation on the basis of their partisan political affiliation.
But should partisanship determine how we see Jesus? Does our political identity tell us who Jesus is?
In the gospel of Matthew, Jesus asks his closest disciples to tell him what people are saying about him. “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” These men have some ready answers for him. People say you are John the Baptist or Elijah or Jeremiah or another of the prophets.
It strikes me as peculiar that the people are saying that Jesus is someone else. They are drawing out well-known individuals from history. Elijah, Jeremiah, and the other prophets of Israel all lived hundreds of years earlier. They are a part of Israel’s history. John the Baptist is the outlier, because he has only recently died. Still, all of the names they offer Jesus are names from the past. They may as well say, “We’ve seen all this before. We’ve got this all figured out. Nothing new here.”
People are pegging Jesus into a mold. They want to pin him down into something they understand – or think they understand anyway.
But then Jesus asks these men, “Who do you say that I am?” and Peter answers him, “The Messiah.” Now that is something different.
The Messiah is the one that the nation of Israel has been waiting for. The word messiah, Christ in Greek, means “anointed one.” If God has chosen a person for a special job, such as a king or a priest, they would be anointed to that position. Anointing with oil is the external action that affirms the internal calling.
But over time, the term Messiah came to be understood in a unique way. The Messiah was the one who was to come and redeem Israel. The Messiah, many people believed, would come from the lineage of King David and would rebuild Israel to its former strength. They looked back at the kingdom of David as the glory days for Israel and there was a deep longing to return to that state.
So, you might say, calling Jesus the Messiah is something new. But it is also seemingly about returning to something old and familiar.
Because people had pretty clear ideas of what the Messiah would be like, what he would do. They were looking for a savior who would restore strength, prosperity, and peace to Israel.
Which is what we hope to get from our politicians, by the way.
The disciples thought Jesus was the Messiah. And they thought they knew just what the Messiah would be. But they did not yet know that Jesus was all about something entirely different.
Something quite different from what they may have hoped for.
It seems that the people wanted to make Jesus into the image that conformed to their desires. Instead of conforming themselves to Jesus. And I am afraid that we are doing the same thing. Maybe we have always done the same thing.
When you look at the ways Jesus has been portrayed in art through the centuries, you discover these portrayals seem to reflect what was going on in the world at that time. In the earliest images, Jesus looked like a Greek or Roman shepherd, full of caring and gentleness. For a small, young, vulnerable church finding its way, that must have seemed comforting and assuring – but that changed.
During the age of the imperial church, once Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire, we began to see images of Jesus as king or warrior – a man who radiated power seated on a throne or carrying weapons of war.
As time went by and the church spread and grew in all parts of the world, some portrayals of Jesus took on certain ethnic or racial features. There are images of Japanese Jesus, African Jesus, Native American Jesus. And of course, the most dominant ones we see are of Jesus as a white man of European descent. Humans want to see Jesus in their own image. We want to recognize Jesus.
That is not inherently wrong. Jesus does not belong to any one ethnic group if he is the savior of the world. It can be helpful for an image of Jesus to assure you that you do, indeed, belong to him.
But it is also possible for our images of Jesus to go badly astray. Like the images of Jesus that make him look like he’s on steroids. The images of Jesus carrying a big gun. He looks like a hero in one of the revenge movies that are popular now. He looks like someone to be afraid of. Nothing about this image says forgiveness, let alone, “Love your enemies.”
Humans have created many faces of Jesus – some good, some meh, some just bad. But to worship a Jesus that seems to largely contradict the gospel message is a problem for the church. And that is a real risk when we let partisan politics set the tone of our religious life.
This temptation to turn things upside down and let partisanship call the shots for the church comes in all flavors. I have heard Christians on the political left declare an ultimatum, saying that if your church is not preaching about the most current front-page, hot-button news controversy, then you need to find another church. And I have heard Christians on the political right say that Christians who do not follow their party line are Christians in name only; or worse, apostate – a traitor to the faith.
Too often I get the impression that Christians are making such statements too hastily, before actually checking in with Jesus; before reflecting faithfully on the message of scripture. That takes time; it requires faithful, open-hearted, humble reflection.
We know Jesus is the Messiah, but it is not always clear that we understand what that means. Jesus is identified as the Messiah in the very first sentence of the New Testament. Matthew 1:1. It is a fact that we know from the get-go. But it is only the beginning of understanding what that means.
Jesus’ disciples surely did not understand yet while they were having this conversation with him – even Peter. Real understanding would time some time. So when Jesus forbids them to talk about it, he is trying to prevent them from going off with some halfway understanding and calling it the good news. He wants to keep them from going out and sharing a little bit of knowledge that would be way more harmful than helpful. He wants them to have the whole story before they try to tell it to others.
Well, we have it – the whole story. And the challenge for us is to remember it. The challenge is to let the story stand, without distorting it. The challenge is to conform our lives, our ministry, our church, to the gospel, rather than to conform Jesus and the gospel to our comfortable lives.
It is a challenge.
Jesus offers Peter the keys to the kingdom, meaning that he is given authority. We, the church, are given this authority. But if you misuse the story, what are you going to do with the keys? If you have the wrong story, will the keys even work?
Maybe the church needs to get serious about finding the right keys.
May we listen to the story in a spirit of humility.
May we seek the authentic Jesus rather than the one that is a pleasing reflection of ourselves.
May we become the church that looks and acts just like Jesus.







